Thursday, December 21, 2006

Important article

Why isn't Cheney right about the importance of a totally unfettered Executive managing foreign policy and responding to security threats? Even people who are thoughtful and sane, such as Judge Posner in some of his popular writings on these subjects, take the point about the importance of Presidential discretion in terms of energy and effectiveness.

One counter-argument is that an individual's decision quality will likely be more variable, for bad as well good, than the actions of collective institutions such as the U.S. Congress. Obviously, this point seems especially forceful after 6 years with the worst President in U.S. history, a man who knows less, thinks less, reads less, and is less emotionally mature than my 10 and 13 year old children. But of course one shouldn't over-generalize from how bad he is to the Presidency as a long-term institution, except insofar as he so vividly illustrates the variance and downside risk.

The highly regarded Harvard economist Edward Glaeser has an interesting new National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, "The Political Economy of Warfare" (# 12738, available on line at www.nber.org but to subscribers only) that could hardly be more timely in illustrating one of the broader problems. His analysis is not new, as he makes very clear up front, but is vital and under-appreciated.

To quote from the introduction:

"Why do countries, both democracies and dictatorships, engage in massively self-destructive wars? ....

"This paper ... presents a model of warfare where leaders benefit from conflict even though the population as a whole loses. Warfare creates domestic political advantages, both for insecure incumbents like Napoleon III and flr long-shot challengers, like Islamic extremists in the Middle East, even though it is costly to the nation as a whole. Self-destructive wars can be seen as an agency cost problem where politicians hurt the nation but increase their probability of political success. This problem becomes more severe if the population can be falsely persuaded that another country is a threat."

The paper's analysis uses a political economy model plus the following historical examples: Napoleon III, Bismarck, the European participants in World War I, and the U.S. from 1896 through 1975.

This is not a paper that will be criticized on the ground that extending the period analyzed would change the empirical conclusions.

Designing institutions without regard to agency costs is not an intellectually defensible course.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Probably a little lowbrow for this blog...

"Why, of course, the people don't want war," [Hermann] Goering shrugged. "Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship."

"There is one difference," I pointed out. "In a democracy the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare wars."

"Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country."


Excerpted from Snopes.com.

Anonymous said...

its here

phentermine search
phentermine
tramadol
cialis

Anonymous said...

Phentermine
Phentermine search
Ringtone search
Tramadol
Phentermine
cialis

Anonymous said...

Relax and Enjoy !!!!

tramadol
phentermine
cialis
casino

Anonymous said...

Relax and enjoy

Casino
viagra
tramadol
cialis

Anonymous said...

Tramadol, viagra

viagra
tramadol
cialis

Anonymous said...

Latest news. Viagra, cialis

viagra
cialis
tramadol

viagra said...

Disaster is likely to wreak havoc in the life of an individual as soon as he becomes victim to erectile dysfunction and the most significant dreadful consequence of erectile dysfunction is that the afflicted man becomes incapable of facilitating erections required for sexual intercourse. The sexual vacuum resulted from erectile dysfunction prompts the sufferer to opt for anti-impotency pills, most especially the viagra medication that was approved by FDA (Food and Drugs Administration) as a clinically effective drug to cure erectile dysfunction in men. Viagra is meant to be administered by patients only after availing of viagra prescription from the doctor. The prescription for Viagra provided by the doctor spells out that the patient suffering from erectile dysfunction seriously need Viagra to treat his disorder and further authorizes the patient to avail of Viagra from the pharmacist.

Health info site said...

Erectile Dysfunction is regarded as the most prevalent male sexual disorder and Viagra, the Pfizer manufactured medication is considered to be the most effective treatment of erectile dysfunction by physicians as well as patients worldwide. People suffering from erectile dysfunction instantly opt for Viagra and Viagra related information online as well as in various offline sources in order to start off their anti-impotency treatment successfully. If you are an erectile dysfunction patient, you can seek out Viagra details on several authentic online sources and more especially, the sitemap section at buy-Viagra-with-us.com contains informative Viagra links that would provide you significant Viagra details and ensure your successful treatment with the drug.

Anonymous said...

What should I discuss with my healthcare provider before taking Viagra?
Do not take viagra even if you are using a drug for nitrate chest pain or heart problems. This includes nitroglycerin (Nitrostat, Nitrolingual, Nitro-Dur, Nitro-services, and others), isosorbide dinitrate (Dilatrate-SR, Isordil, Sorbitrate), and isosorbide mononitrate (Imdur, ISMO, Monoket). Nitrates are also found in some recreational drugs such as amyl nitrate or nitrite (poppers). Nitrate Taking generic viagra with a drug can cause a severe decrease in blood pressure, leading to fainting, stroke or heart attack.
A small number of patients who have had a sudden loss of vision after taking Viagra. This type of vision loss is caused by decreased blood flow to the optic nerve eyes. It is not clear whether Viagra is the real cause of the loss of that vision. Sudden loss of vision with buy viagra use has occurred most often in people with heart disease

cheap viagra pills for sale said...

The disease called erectile dysfunction has strengthened its roots among the human breed mainly because of the reason that people are not very willing to share it willingly. These people can get all the information in the ED info sites. Through this information you can do away with their ED.

Anonymous said...

Generic Viagra
Online Generic Viagra
buy generic viagra cialis
Buy generic viagra cialis propecia
Buy generic cialis tadalafil
Generic cialis
Tadalafil
Buy generic viagra sildenafil
Generic viagra
Sildenafil
Propecia
Finasteride
Vardenafil
generic levitra
Buy generic levitra

Buy Prilosec Online said...

Buy Nexium Online
Buy Prilosec Online
Buy Premarin Online
Buy Flomax Online
Buy Glucophage Online
Buy Tramadol Online
Buy Allegra Online
Buy Phentrimine Online
Buy Herbal Phentermine Online

hannah said...

I never go to my doctor anymore asking for pain killers prescription and then be turned down at the end, all I do is order online from www.medsheaven.com hassle free and low cost, they have three pain killers listed on their website which are ultram tramadol celebrex that you buy, and the best part is no prescription required!!!