Wednesday, December 20, 2017

How to gain under the budget rules from sloppy drafting

Everyone knows how unconscionably rushed and sloppy the Republican tax bill was.  What's gotten less focus is how the ineptitude of the process may pay future budget-rules benefits to the Republicans.

Suppose we start from the bill's estimated $1.4 trillion ten-year cost (ignoring for now the "dynamic" issues that the Joint Committee thought might lower it to $1 trillion - although better estimates by analysts with greater independence from political pressure show less offset than this).

Now suppose that two drafting errors or omissions, triggering massive tax avoidance responses that the JCT did not anticipate, turn out to have 10-year budgetary costs of $100 billion each.

Suppose that Blunder #1 goes to people the Republican leadership likes, such as business owners who take unexpected unadvantage of the lower corporate rate, fun and games with passthroughs, etc.

All they have to do is leave this in place, and they get to shower $100 billion more on their friends, who will be duly grateful, without its ever appearing in a revenue score.

Now suppose that Blunder # 2 goes to people the Republican leadership doesn't like, such as blue state professionals who end up, one way or another, getting the equivalent of extra state and local income tax deductions due to countermeasures that they and their state legislatures develop.

Say this triggers "technical corrections" to take away the extra $100 billion that people have figured out how to save in taxes, via gaps and mistakes in the original drafting.  In effect, this retroactively causes the original revenue estimate for repealing the deduction to be correct after all.  Only, the Congressional Republicans get budgetary credit for a $100 billion revenue increase that would have been denied them, had they drafted the bill more competently upfront. And there's no sort of budget-rules offset for the fact that the 2017 revenue estimate, based on what was actually enacted, ought to have been $100 billion higher, purely as a matter of logical consistency. So upfront incompetence is potentially all upside for these guys.


Dr Purva Pius said...

I’m Charles David by name, i want to use this medium to alert all loan seekers to be very careful because there are scam everywhere, Few months ago I was financially strained, and due to my desperation I was scammed by several online lenders. I had almost lost hope until a friend of mine referred me to a very reliable lender called Dr Purva Pius ( A God fearing man) who lend me a loan of $237,000 under 72 working hours without any stress. I explain to the company by mail and all they told me was to cry no more because i will get my loan from this company and also i have made the right choice of contacting them i filled the loan application form and proceeded with all that was requested of me and to my shock I was given the loan, If you are in need of any kind of loan just contact him now via: {}

I‘m using this medium to alert all loan seekers because of the hell I passed through in the hands of those fraudulent lenders.

Thanks you Dr Purva Pius Loan service for your help.

Wilson Freeman said...

Good day to you all, i just want to share this with you friends, because am so happy now , finally i just got my loan from Mr Wilson if you are in any need of any type of loan you can contact him through this email (


Hello Everybody,
My name is Mrs Sharon Sim. I live in Singapore and i am a happy woman today? and i told my self that any lender that rescue my family from our poor situation, i will refer any person that is looking for loan to him, he gave me happiness to me and my family, i was in need of a loan of S$250,000.00 to start my life all over as i am a single mother with 3 kids I met this honest and GOD fearing man loan lender that help me with a loan of S$250,000.00 SG. Dollar, he is a GOD fearing man, if you are in need of loan and you will pay back the loan please contact him tell him that is Mrs Sharon, that refer you to him. contact Dr Purva Pius,via email:( Thank you.