I saw the new Tarantino film yesterday, I mainly quite enjoyed it, but didn't think it was great. And not nearly as convulsive as, say, Pulp Fiction or Reservoir Dogs.
It's rather an odd duck. One set piece after another,
usually entertaining but without much forward momentum. Also, it feels
incredibly tailored to his personal obsessions - e.g., his pro-old Hollywood,
anti-hippie nostalgia, and his wanting to re-create what a pool party at a
Playboy mansion in the late 1960s might have been like - without entirely
making the sale to the audience that we should share them at least for the
film's duration. (Cf. Hitchcock, who specialized in effectively transmitting
his dark personal obsessions to the audience.)
Brad Pitt was very
charismatic in the classic old Hollywood manner. DiCaprio, interestingly, was
deliberately made far less so, although as an actor he obviously has similar
chops.
The ending, not to issue undue spoilers to any few of you out
there who might not know it yet (but who still plan to see the film), drew
power from the (altered) historical event's having such a huge cultural
resonance, at least to anyone old enough to know and care about it. So there
was a point at which the tension rises because one is thinking, my gawd, here
it comes. But I still was left with a sense of a bunch of different things
thrown together because they're all stuff from 1969 that the director wanted to
play with
No comments:
Post a Comment